by: Andreas Moritz
White House press secretary Tony Snow died in July 2008 at the age of 53,
following a series of chemotherapy treatments for colon cancer. In 2005,
Snow had his colon removed and underwent six months of chemotherapy after
being diagnosed with colon cancer. Two years later (2007), Snow underwent
surgery to remove a growth in his abdominal area, near the site of the original
cancer. "This is a very treatable condition," said Dr. Allyson
Ocean, a gastrointestinal oncologist at Weill Cornell Medical College. "Many
patients, because of the therapies we have, are able to work and live full
lives with quality while they're being treated. Anyone who looks at this
as a death sentence is wrong." But of course we now know, Dr. Ocean
was dead wrong.
media headlines proclaimed Snow died from colon cancer, although they knew
he didn't have a colon anymore. Apparently, the malignant cancer had "returned"
(from where?) and "spread" to the liver and elsewhere in his body.
In actual fact, the colon surgery severely restricted his normal eliminative
functions, thereby overburdening the liver and tissue fluids with toxic
waste. The previous series of chemo-treatments inflamed and irreversibly
damaged a large number of cells in his body, and also impaired his immune
system -- a perfect recipe for growing new cancers. Now unable to heal the
causes of the original cancer (in addition to the newly created ones), Snow's
body developed new cancers in the liver and other parts of the body.
mainstream media, of course, still insist Snow died from colon cancer, thus
perpetuating the myth that it is only the cancer that kills people, not
the treatment. Nobody seems to raise the important point that it is extremely
difficult for a cancer patient to actually heal from this condition while
being subjected to the systemic poisons of chemotherapy and deadly radiation.
If you are bitten by a poisonous snake and don't get an antidote for it,
isn't it likely that your body becomes overwhelmed by the poison and, therefore,
cannot function anymore?
Tony Snow began his chemo-treatments for his second colon cancer, he still
looked healthy and strong. But after a few weeks into his treatment, he
started to develop a coarse voice, looked frail, turned gray and lost his
hair. Did the cancer do all this to him? Certainly not. Cancer doesn't do
such a thing, but chemical poisoning does. He actually looked more ill than
someone who has been bitten by a poisonous snake.
the mainstream media ever report about the overwhelming scientific evidence
that shows chemotherapy has zero benefits in the five-year survival rate
of colon cancer patients? Or how many oncologists stand up for their cancer
patients and protect them against chemotherapy treatment which they very
well know can cause them to die far more quickly than if they received no
treatment at all? Can you trustingly place your life into their hands when
you know that most of them would not even consider chemotherapy for themselves
if they were diagnosed with cancer? What do they know that you don't? The
news is spreading fast that in the United States physician-caused fatalities
now exceed 750,000 each year. Perhaps, many doctors no longer trust in what
they practice, for good reasons.
cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy... Chemotherapy does
not eliminate breast, colon or lung cancers. This fact has been documented
for over a decade. Yet doctors still use chemotherapy for these tumors...
Women with breast cancer are likely to die faster with chemo than without
it." - Alan Levin, M.D.
by the Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre,
Australia, into the contribution of chemotherapy to 5-year survival in 22
major adult malignancies, showed startling results: The overall contribution
of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults
was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA." [Royal
North Shore Hospital Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2005 Jun;17(4):294.]
research covered data from the Cancer Registry in Australia and the Surveillance
Epidemiology and End Results in the USA for the year 1998. The current 5-year
relative adult survival rate for cancer in Australia is over 60%, and no
less than that in the USA. By comparison, a mere 2.3% contribution of chemotherapy
to cancer survival does not justify the massive expense involved and the
tremendous suffering patients experience because of severe, toxic side effects
resulting from this treatment. With a meager success rate of 2.3%, selling
chemotherapy as a medical treatment (instead of a scam), is one of the greatest
fraudulent acts ever committed. The average chemotherapy earns the medical
establishment a whopping $300,000 to $1,000,000 each year, and has so far
earned those who promote this pseudo-medication (poison) over 1 trillion
dollars. It's no surprise that the medical establishment tries to keep this
scam alive for as long as possible.
the highly respected German epidemiologist, Dr. Ulrich Abel from the Tumor
Clinic of the University of Heidelberg, conducted the most comprehensive
investigation of every major clinical study on chemotherapy drugs ever done.
Abel contacted 350 medical centers and asked them to send him anything they
had ever published on chemotherapy. He also reviewed and analyzed thousands
of scientific articles published in the most prestigious medical journals.
It took Abel several years to collect and evaluate the data. Abel's epidemiological
study, which was published on August 10, 1991 in The Lancet, should have
alerted every doctor and cancer patient about the risks of one of the most
common treatments used for cancer and other diseases. In his paper, Abel
came to the conclusion that the overall success rate of chemotherapy was
"appalling." According to this report, there was no scientific
evidence available in any existing study to show that chemotherapy can "extend
in any appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the most common
points out that chemotherapy rarely improves the quality of life. He describes
chemotherapy as "a scientific wasteland" and states that even
though there is no scientific evidence that chemotherapy works, neither
doctor nor patient is willing to give up on it. The mainstream media has
never reported on this hugely important study, which is hardly surprising,
given the enormous vested interests of the groups that sponsor the media,
that is, the pharmaceutical companies. A recent search turned up exactly
zero reviews of Abel's work in American journals, even though it was published
in 1990. I believe this is not because his work was unimportant -- but because
it is irrefutable.
truth of the matter would be far too costly for the pharmaceutical industry
to bear, thus making it unacceptable. If the mass media reported the truth
that medical drugs, including chemotherapy drugs, are used to practically
commit genocide in the U.S. and the world, their best sponsors (the pharmaceutical
companies) would have to withdraw their misleading advertisements from the
television media, radio stations, magazines, and newspapers. But neither
group wants to go bankrupt.
doctors go as far as prescribing chemotherapy drugs to patients for malignancies
that are far too advanced for surgery, with the full knowledge that there
are no benefits at all. Yet they claim chemotherapy to be an effective cancer
treatment, and their unsuspecting patients believe that "effective"
equals "cure." The doctors, of course, refer to the FDA's definition
of an "effective" drug, one which achieves a 50% or more reduction
in tumor size for 28 days. They neglect to tell their patients that there
is no correlation whatsoever between shrinking tumors for 28 days and curing
the cancer or extending life. Temporary tumor shrinkage through chemotherapy
has never been shown to cure cancer or to extend life. In other words, you
can live with an untreated tumor for just as long as you would with one
that has been shrunken or been eliminated by chemotherapy (or radiation).
has never been shown to have curative effects for cancer. By contrast, the
body can still cure itself, which it actually tries to do by developing
cancer. Cancer is more a healing response than it is a disease. The "disease"
is the body's attempt to cure itself of an existing imbalance. And sometimes,
this healing response continues even if a person is subjected to chemotherapy
(and/or radiation). Unfortunately, as the previously mentioned research
has demonstrated, the chances for a real cure are greatly reduced when patients
are treated with chemotherapy drugs.
side effects of the treatment can be horrendous and heartbreaking for both
patients and their loved ones, all in the name of trustworthy medical treatment.
Although the drug treatment comes with the promise to improve the patient's
quality of life, it is just common sense that a drug that makes them throw
up and lose their hair, while wrecking their immune system, is doing the
exact opposite. Chemo-therapy can give the patient life-threatening mouth
sores. It attacks the immune system by destroying billions of immune cells
(white blood cells). Its deadly poisons inflame every part of the body.
The drugs can slough off the entire lining of their intestines. The most
common side effect experienced among chemo patients is their complete lack
of energy. The new additional drugs now given to many chemo patients may
prevent the patient from noticing some of the side effects, but they hardly
reduce the immensely destructive and suppressive effect of the chemotherapy
itself. Remember, the reason chemotherapy can shrink some tumors is because
it causes massive destruction in the body.
have cancer, you may think that feeling tired is just part of the disease.
This rarely is the case. Feeling unusually tired is more likely due to anemia,
a common side effect of most chemotherapy drugs. Chemo drugs can dramatically
decrease your red blood cell levels, and this reduces oxygen availability
to the 60-100 trillion cells of your body. You can literally feel the energy
being zapped from every cell of your body -- a physical death without dying.
Chemo-caused fatigue has a negative impact on day-to-day activities in 89%
of all patients. With no energy, there can be no joy and no hope, and all
bodily functions become subdued.
long-term side effect is that these patients' bodies can no longer respond
to nutritional or immune-strengthening approaches to cancerous tumors. All
of this may explain why cancer patients who do not receive any treatment
at all, have an up to four times higher remission rate than those who receive
treatment. The sad thing is that chemotherapy does not cure 96% to 98% of
all cancers anyway. Conclusive evidence (for the majority of cancers) that
chemotherapy has any positive influence on survival or quality of life does
chemotherapy as a treatment for cancer is misleading, to say the least.
By permanently damaging the body's immune system and other important parts,
chemo-therapy has become a leading cause of treatment-caused diseases such
as heart disease, liver disease, intestinal diseases, diseases of the immune
system, infections, brain diseases, pain disorders, and rapid aging.
committing themselves to being poisoned, cancer patients need to question
their doctors and ask them to produce the research or evidence that shrinking
a tumor actually translates to any increase in survival. If they tell you
that chemotherapy is your best chance of surviving, you will know they are
lying or are simply misinformed. As Abel's research clearly demonstrated,
there is no such evidence anywhere to be found in the medical literature.
Subjecting patients to chemotherapy robs them of a fair chance of finding
or responding to a real cure and deserves criminal prosecution.
Moritz's book, Cancer is not a Disease - It's a Survival Mechanism, explains
the root causes of cancer and how to eliminate them for good. Available