9/11 - A Reasonable Interpretation of a Strange Event

A Pictorial Review

This is the conspiracy theorists' worst nightmare –

Over 100 fire fighters report bombs at the WTC on 9/11

Records show two of the four 'crashed' planes didn't even take off and left no verifiable wreckage

Numerous hijackers have turned up alive

And the science! Guess what? Planes don't fly through buildings!

Where does the truth lie? You decide what really happened on 9/11.

Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance – Albert Einstein

There are such big holes in the official 9/11 story it is difficult to prove even the most basic details are plausible. Ignore if you can the misinformation, what you think you know and the popular view. Now, look again at what we were told and see if it adds up. The following overview is not a complete assessment of all the facts only some of them. There is a whole lot more to this story and all of it points in the same direction. The truth has not been told.

To begin with two of the flights we were told crashed on what they call ‘9/11’ never even took off and are acknowledged as flying in the weeks after 9/11. Think about that for a moment. American Airlines agree that their flights numbered 77 (Pentagon) and 11 (1st tower, North) did not fly on 9/11 but did so in the weeks after. Did not fly on 9/11! This revelation aside, there is little in the way of physical evidence to prove that these planes crashed, in fact not a single part that can be positively identified as belonging to any named plane from any of the four sites. All parts carry a serial number. And the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) hold electronic data on all flights leaving US soil and their records correspond perfectly with this revealing detail.

This information and a more comprehensive essay on the absent flights is here: link

We know from BTS records that:

  • American Airlines Flight 11 (WTC 1) was scheduled to do so but never left Boston’s Logan International Airport (BOS) on 9/11
  • United Airlines 175 (WTC 2) took off from Boston’s Logan International at 8.23am
  • AA Flight 77 (Pentagon) never left Washington Dulles International (IAD)
  • UA Flight 93 (Shanksville) left the runway at Newark Liberty International (EWR) at exactly 8.28am

You can see a recent screen shot of the relevant BTS pages saved here: link

Check for yourself with the BTS: link

This information regarding the Pentagon (AA77) flight corresponds with a lack of wreckage at the Pentagon as can be seen in the next few images. This is a Boeing 767, said to have been used in two of the attacks, it’s similar to the 757 used in the other two but a little bigger.

This is the type of passenger plane we are told was aimed into the Pentagon after performing the most unlikely of fighter jet manouvres, expertly piloted by an unqualified, incompetent amateur with no experience of flying one. According to the managers of an Arizona flying school attended by the diminutive conspiarcy theorists' 'hijack team pilot' Hani Hanjour, they had reported him repeatedly to the Federal Aviation Authority over their concerns not that he was a terrorist but because of his bad flying ability. Another, Peggy Cherette of the JetTech flying school told CBS News that she, “couldn’t believe (Hanjour) had a commercial licence of any kind with the skills that he had.” link Hanjour’s grasp of English was also poor.

Everywhere you look for something to back up the proposition that this man was capable of pulling off the unrealistic Pentagon stunt with a big plane you get the same response. No way!

Duncan K.M. Hastie, owner of the CRM flight school in Arizona, described him as “a weak student” who was “wasting our resources.” The Cape Cod Times, October 21, 2001.

Sawyer Aviation's Wes Fults remembers training Hanjour, whom he says “got overwhelmed with the instruments” in the school’s flight simulator. “He had only the barest understanding of what the instruments were there to do. He used the simulator three or four times, then disappeared like a fog.” And less than one month before 9/11 Hanjour was refused rental of a single engine Cessna by Freeway chief flight instructor Marcel Bernard due to his ineptitude in managing a light aircraft. link

Curiously, the US Government’s whitewash investigation into 9/11, The 9/11 Commission Report, does acknowledge Hanjour’s poor English and flying skills. The report even notes that flight instructors had urged Hanjour to give up trying to become a pilot. Intriguingly, however, they also refer to Hanjour as “the [al Qaeda] operation’s most experienced pilot”, which really does paint a good picture of what we are dealing with here.

Hani Hanjour

The depth of mistrust in the official version of events is exemplified by some of the people used to mislead the world through this ‘final report’. Senator Max Cleland - Former member of the 9/11 Commission, resigned in December 2003 stating bravely: "I, as a member of the [9/11] Commission, cannot look any American in the eye... It is a national scandal... this White House wants to cover [9/11] up."

Vice Chairman, 9/11 Commission, Lee Hamilton, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Homeland Security Advisory Council: "we got started late; we had a very short time frame...we did not have enough money... We had a lot of people strongly opposed to what we did. We had a lot of trouble getting access to documents and to people. ... So there were all kinds of reasons we thought we were set up to fail."

9/11 Commissioner, Timothy J. Roemer, PhD, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence: "That panel members so distrusted testimony from Pentagon officials that they referred their concerns to the Pentagon's inspector general...We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting."

Senior Counsel, 9/11 Commission, John J. Farmer, Jr., Former Attorney General, NJ, Former Commissioner of the State Commission of Investigations: [Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public] - "I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described...The tapes told a radically ­­­different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years." link

Even the computer keyboard can be confusing technology but imagine sitting at the controls of this contraption and trying to find your way. Literally. Across the skies. The cockpit of this monster propels a highly complex and sensitive machine, the likes of which you have never operated before. Also note that these four planes allegedly took really peculiar routes to their destinations making unexplainable detours and u turns as they went, if we are to believe the official version.

It weighs in excess of 80 tonnes, is carrying an estimated 9,000 gallons of fuel, dozens of hysterical passengers, flight crew and luggage, is not navigating with the assistance of ground control, since you took that away by switching of the transponder (four times) which alone creates enormous problems for even the most skilled pilot, and you will be buzzed by scrambled military kill jets any minute - if history is anything to go by - the pilots of which will be itching to shoot you down (to protect our freedoms). The hijacked Flight 93 was allegedly cruising US airspace for 45 minutes uninterrupted. There were four of them flying around following unrealistic, indirect flight paths for one-and-a-and-half-hours with no response from anyone. Even the eight professional pilots, some ex military men well trained in not giving away their aircraft mid flight, apparently failed to respond to their vehicles being taken off them by a couple of crazy passengers with small knives. Not one Mayday call was sent by any of the four hijacked planes yet it is standard procedure under such circumstances to dial in this simple code, if nothing else.

You are speeding along at 530 miles an hour in your commandeered craft when performing a steep, breath-taking decline toward your target before levelling out a few feet above the ground and guiding your plane into the centre of this most secure, narrow target and making it disappear. Helpfully this little stunt will resign to a distant memory the admission by Donald Rumsfeld a few hours earlier that $2.3 trillion was missing from Pentagon accounts.

There is a no fly zone around and about the most powerful military command centre in the world which always performed impeccably and the Pentagon has its own defensive missile system to protect against incoming aircraft. But this was 9/11 and all the rules were set to be broken.

Four of these large, powerful vehicles were said to have crashed on 9/11 but not a single identifiable part of any of them has been produced. There is no physical proof that these planes crashed, nothing to show the jury

This is an early shot taken minutes after the incident occurred and half an hour before the roof section of the Pentagon collapsed. The plane is where? It is said to have smashed into centre of this wall a few feet above the ground leaving behind only a hole approximately 16 ft in diameter. Notice the lawn in not scorched, it is in fact pristine.

Where is it? Here fire fighters wander past the damaged wall of the Pentagon with no serious fire to fight and no wreckage to work through just minutes after the 'plane' allegedly crashed. Note the roof has begun to lose shape but remains intact. You can also see wire spools from ongoing renovation of this sparsely occupied section of the building seemingly unruffled by the incoming aircraft.

The hole which we are told was created by this plane appears to be inconsistent with the impact of a fuel filled, wide body passenger jet. One curious explanation for this anomaly is that the wings folded back upon impact and slipped into the hole with the rest of this magical plane. Another is that the plane evaporated/disintegrated upon impact with the outer wall and all trace vanished before the cameras arrived. Forget the 125ft wings, the 44 ft high rear stabilizer and the indestructible landing gear, the engines weigh in at 6000lbs each of steel and titanium. Disintegrated because they hit a softer object? It has never happened before or since but then 9/11 was full of one off special offers!

The roof section gave way 45 minutes after the impact or explosion creating more a scene of destruction but still not revealing a crashed plane.

No seats, no luggage, no wings, engines or tail section, no bodies … There's nothing one would expect to see at a plane crash site. How ever hard it is to take on board this story really doesn’t add up.

US Govt. photographs from the Pentagon show a lone engine rotor with a diameter of no more than three feet, so from something much smaller than a 757. This is as physically close as we get to an aircraft. At a 757 crash site there would be two of these and they would be three times this size.

Something like this

An estimated 250 feet inside of the Pentagon beyond several toughened walls was found this hole which we are invited to believe was caused by the soft nose of the incredible Flight 77 as it passed through the building after disintegrating upon impact and leaving no identifiable part! The official narrative does not claim an engine created this hole and a quick glance at the visual evidence shows the engines did not enter the building. So it must have been the nose, right?


Some think another sort of aircraft was used to punch these holes. Indeed Donald Rumsfeld himself let slip during an interview on October 21 2001 when he referred to “the missile” that “damage(d) this building and similar (inadudible) that damaged the World Trade Center.” link

In addition, as can be seen in this fascinating investigation by the Citizens Investigation Team, the official version of the flight path has now been utterly discredited by key witnesses including police officers and the inimitable taxi driver Lloyde England, who was central to this story at the time after his cab was reportedly speared by a light pole uprooted by the swooping, suicidal Flight 77. The CIT evidence, the aircraft manufacturers, the pilot skills and physical factors alone make it impossible for Flight 77 to have performed this exotic manoeuvre and spectacular collision as claimed by war mongering conspiracy theorists. link

According to Capt. Russ Wittenberg, U.S. Air Force, fighter pilot, commercial pilot flying 707, 720, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, and 777s who had previously flown Flight 93 and Flight 175: "The government story they handed us about 9/11 is total B.S. plain and simple... [Regarding Flight 77] "The airplane could not have flown at those speeds which they said it did without going into what they call a high speed stall. The airplane won’t go that fast if you start pulling those high G maneuvers at those bank angles... The vehicle that hit the Pentagon was not Flight 77." link

This is a Global Hawk painted to look like an AA plane. It’s a missile. It isn’t a real paint job but such a thing could explain the rotor photographed at the Pentagon of which a Global Hawk has one of the same size, and the damage done to the building, and Rumsfled’s admission and witnesses who saw a plane.


Then there are these things to consider. Maybe Al Qaeda nicked one of these instead of the Boeing’s they were thought to have taken? Maybe they painted them to look like passenger jets? They are cunning and ruthless remember.


Numerous recorded witnesses positively identified planes near to 9/11 events, planes that didn’t crash. Some researchers think this is probably what happened at the Pentagon and certainly the CIT investigation draws this conclusion based on previously ignored witness evidence.



To complete the web of deceit surrounding this incident the key suspects have refused to release any film of the mysterious Flight 77 which they first denied (lied about) but later admitted was captured on Pentagon security cameras. CCTV footage from the surrounding neighbourhood has been withheld also. Withheld by innocent men with nothing to hide? One researcher calculates that a total of 84 videos have been buried away, but even if it was only one in a court of law such a deception by a suspect would be considered highly suspicious and tend to lead to a guilty verdict. Stand in the dock and fail to disclose even the finest detail and you will be condemned for your dishonesty and the rest of your testimony tainted.

This is one of the most secure and surveyed buildings in the world and is peppered with cameras yet all evidence of an incredibly indiscreet Boeing 757 slaming into it has been hidden from the public except for the insulting set of still frames eventually released by the main suspects and seen below. This is the epicentre of high tech, military USA and the best they have to prove what they say happened to them is five grainy still frames from a distant security camera. Travelling at such a speed just above the ground there must have been quite some chaos left in its hurricane force wake as this thing blasted over the local highway a few feet above the ground. Only there wasn’t.

Aviation experts and piloits agree that such speeds are impossible at sea level. The higher we go the less dense the air and the quicker they fly! Think also about when you last saw a passenger plane at any airport pumping out condensation trails. You didn't. The trails are formed of water and ice particles and only exist at altitude not at lawn level. This was a warm morning in New York. The official 9/11 story fails again. The dots do not join up anywhere in this story. We are being deceived.

Anyway, if you are still happy with the official version try this for yourself:

Spot the Boeing!

Note the white plume to the far left just below the skyline. The 'plane' is, we are told, unfortunately obscured by the traffic barrier in the foreground. Shame that. There seems to be some black smoke cloud or something a little in front of where the plane hides, the shape of which changes in the next image and takes the shape of a building.

You happy this is flight 77? Again offered as evidence this would be laughed out of court. Notice that the date stamp is inconsistent with the scene said to be depicted, one that doesn’t come close to showing flight 77 crashing early on the morning of 9/11! It shows a blur and some smoke and an apparent explosion late in the afternoon of September 12! If you look again at still 1 you will notice the word 'plane' helpfully imposed. An odd thing to add to an image you might think. This would not be necessary if there were a plane to see!

You may be called a nutter or a loony or be told you are ‘into conspiracy theories’ for questioning the official version of these events, but surely this is starting to get suspicious? Is there anything in the official version to believe in?

The next image is one of the few that we are told shows the actual hijackers in action but this ‘evidence’ also raises more questions than it answers. Of the thousands of images from service areas, car parks, airports and who knows where else this is the most compelling proof of the Al Qaeda conspiracy theory. This (AP Photo/Portland Police Department) frame is said to show Mohammed Atta, the leader of the team if you like, and Abdulaziz Alomari passing through airport security at Portland International Airport. Since this image has two different time lines, one showing 5:45 and the other 5:53, it doesn’t show any facial features we can identify and is said to show one man who later turned up alive it wouldn’t be useful as evidence in a court of law. In fact it suggests a deception.

Here in other 'evidence' an unidentifiable passenger passes through airport security at Washington Dulles early on 9/11, so they say. On this exhibit there is no date or time stamp at all yet it is claimed as proof of a foreign invasion!

But we haven’t even started yet. What of the incredible hijack team. The 19 Muslims named as guilty of mass murder within hours of the attacks were, we were told by the White House officials within minutes of the attack, led by a man called Osama bin Laden, who lived in a cave on the other side of the world. Simply, his men came because they hated our freedoms. They left Qaran’s, passports and bandanas at the various alleged crash sites but not one of the eight mighty engines or wings or tail sections or anything else from their ‘planes’ was recovered.

Here to remind us is a 767 engine of which there were supposed to be eight involved in the 9/11 events. Still missing. However…


This was allegedly found at the Flight 93 site in Shanksville which we'll get to. It is a business card blown from the pocket of one of the crazed ‘terrorists’

Here is one of the hijacker passports also found at Shanksville

… an ID card from Shanksville

… a bandana from Shanksville

…a passport from Shanksville


…a terrorist ID from the Pentagon event

... part of a driving licence from Shanksville

…and from the WTC, a passport said to have passed through the fireball and was found pretty much intact in a street nearby. This is all somehow slightly comical.


There’s even a 'hijacking letter' from the Shanksville hole in the ground and two other 9/11 crime scenes.


…and Arab man’s passport found at the Shanksville event

Are you still buying this shit? There were other ID cards and passport pieces of Saudi's and other undesirables and even flight manuals said to have been left lying around by the Magical Muslims in Their Flying Machines but we haven’t even got going with silly yet.

Their great leader, Osama bin Laden, was reported to have made a film of himself confessing to the attack. For many of us this was proof of what he stood accused of by a group of international war criminals and the media. In this film which was not released by him but wasfound lying around in a house in Afghanistan by US soldiers, the left handed ‘Muslim fanatic’ ObL is seen wearing a gold wedding ring and a watch, is writing with his right hand and is not looking quite like himself. link

In other media statements, not given airtime in the US, ObL denies all responsibility for the attacks. Take which you will as the truth but he isn’t wanted by the FBI for 9/11. Here is their Most Wanted file. Bin Laden is on it but not for 9/11. link

Further, Rex Tom, FBI Director of Investigative Publicity stated in June 2006 that, “The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice then decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.” link

Of the 19 hijackers now left crammed aboard the two remaining aircraft, the FBI was forced to admit as early as 21 Sept 2001 that their identities were “in question”. In other words the FBI didn’t know who they were, even whether they were Muslims, nor even it would seem if they existed at all! It is well documented that the operation’s best pilot couldn’t adequately fly a light aircraft and since 9/11 several of the others named have come forward and are very much alive and well.

Can a successful suicide bomber still be alive? Can we believe any of those accused are guilty and if so based on what evidence?

The real Salem Al- Hazmi

was not on board the mysterious Pentagon flight 77 as we were told but is in fact alive and unimpressed and lives in Saudi Arabia. Accused of being a dead suicide bomber he actually worked at a government-owned petroleum and chemical plant in the city of Yanbu. Interviewed on September 21 2001 he said had not left Saudi Arabia for two years and that his passport had been stolen by a pickpocket three years previously. The bin Laden in the moody video confession actually praises this hijacker by name along with the next one who we now find is also still alive! Our gullibility is being tested here.

Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri

was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines Flight 11 into the World Trade Centre and his photograph was released with the other suspects. Soon after he appeared in newspapers and on television around the world protesting his innocence from his home town in Morocco.

Abdulaziz Al Omari

is another of the Flight 11 hijackers, who has also been quoted in Arab news reports. He said he was an engineer with Saudi Telecoms, and that he lost his passport while studying in Denver. So confused is the official version that this suspect ID was cobbled together with another man of the same name but different date of birth who also came forward after the event to plead his innocence. link

Ahmed Al-Nami

who worked for Saudi Arabian Airlines at the time told the Daily Telegraph 23 Sept 2001 link "I'm still alive, as you can see. I was shocked to see my name mentioned by the American Justice Department. I had never even heard of Pennsylvania where the plane I was supposed to have hijacked." He still had his passport and said he found it "very worrying" that his identity appeared to have been "stolen" and published by the FBI without any checks. Worrying indeed that real terrorists are left to roam while innocent men are targeted.

And from CNN.com:
September 13, 2001


We would like to correct a report that appeared on CNN. Based on information from multiple law enforcement sources, CNN reported that Adnan Bukhari and Ameer Bukhari of Vero Beach Florida, were suspected to be two of the pilots who crashed planes into the World Trade Center. CNN later learned that Adnan Bukhari is still in Florida, where he was questioned by the FBI. We are sorry for the misinformation. A federal law enforcement source now tells CNN that Bukhari passed an FBI polygraph and is not considered a suspect. Through his attorney, Bukhari says that he is helping authorities. Ameer Bukhari died in a small plane crash last year.' link

The New Yorker - What Went Wrong

by Seymour Hersh - 10/1/01

'Many of the investigators believe that some of the initial clues that were uncovered about the terrorists' identities and preparations, such as flight manuals, were meant to be found. A former high-level intelligence official told me, "Whatever trail was left was left deliberately--for the F.B.I. to chase." In interviews over the past two weeks, a number of intelligence officials have raised questions about Osama bin Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and he's running this operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't have done it alone."'

On behalf of the Saudi Arabian government Prince Saud Al-Faisal, revealed through the Arabic Press in New York following a meeting with GW Bush that at least five Saudi men named were not dead.

We have so far lost two wide-bodied jet liners, several hijackers and the organiser and paymaster of this thing. Now we come to the third flight, the United Airlines 93 that left Newark Liberty International airport at 9.01 and was reported to have been hijacked and forced down by heroic passengers in a field in Pennsylvania just over one hour later.

Here is a US Government exhibit. A picture of the ‘crash site’.

See if you can find any sign of this passenger plane. There are a couple of images that have since emerged which purport to show small plane parts (as with other sites) but no part can be linked to said aircraft so the authenticity is in question. Journalists first on the scene at the time were as dumbfounded as those now looking back for evidence of a plane crash. One photographer, Chris Konicki struggled to find words to describe what he saw when he arrived:

Fox News Reporter (September 11 2001): “Any large pieces of debris at all?”

Konicki: “Na, there was nothing, nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed there.”

Reporter: “Smoke? Fire?”

Konicki: “Nothing. It was absolutely quite. It was, uh, actually very quiet. Um, nothing going on down there. No smoke. No fire. Just a couple of people walking around."

Reporter: “What could you see on the ground?”

Konicki: “You could just see dirt, ash and… people walking around.”

There was a hole he estimated to be no more than 20 x 10 feet. As seen filmed by NBC from the air on 9/11. link

If this really is a plane crash then there is something significant missing.

Just 20 minutes after the event, Wally Miller, a funeral director and the Somerset County Coroner was among the very first to arrive at the site of the reported crash and he got as close as anyone. He was stunned at how small the smoking crater looked, he told the Washington Post link that the scene looked, "like someone took a scrap truck, dug a 10-foot ditch and dumped all this trash into it. I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies there. It became like a giant funeral service."

"There was just nothing visible," he said. "It was the strangest feeling." He confesses to the Pittsburg Post Gazette link: "This is the most eerie thing. I have not, to this day, seen a single drop of blood. Not a drop."

All of the eyewitnesses to the crash scene, fire fighters and all, were equally confused that there was no wreckage where they had been told a plane had crashed.

This is the most revealing media coverage link as it was told on the day but since only via the Internet. Anyone believing that Flight 93 crashed here and was swallowed whole leaving no trace of itself should avoid calling anyone who doubts this story a crackpot!

This is what the conspiracy theorists’ claim happened…

Only the plane kept on going until it had all been gobbled up! Seriously, this is the official conspiracy theory!

Rescue workers seem at a loss for something to do

Notice a shallow crater, un-burnt grass and no recognizable plane debris, luggage, bodies... There was a lot of small debris and bits of paper but 120,000 lbs of aircraft apparently disappeared.

According to the official story, the one-time open pit mine had been backfilled with soft dirt, which 'liquefied’ when the plane arrived. The entire aircraft and thousands of gallons of fuel burrowed itself deeply in the ground and right out of sight, so the story goes.

The hole


As no conventional plane wreckage can be identified at this crash site one is left to consider that a third plane is absent from the official conspiracy theory. There were reports of Flight 93 making an emergency landing on the morning of 9/11 at Cleveland International Airport and the passengers being evacuated due to fears of there being a bomb on board link. This claim was confirmed by United Airlines and the Shanksville Mayor Ernie Stull, who also told German TV: “Everybody was… dumbfounded because they were called to an aircraft crash, and there is no airplane! No airplane. There was nothing... Only this hole!”

Numerous other witnesses saw and heard a second plane in the skies over Shanksville at the time of the explosion and there are many who reported that debris was scattered over a distance of eight miles suggesting something happened high in the sky. Perhaps this plane was shot down? By Al Qaeda perhaps? All aspects of the media led version are at odds with these facts. We are shown a hole where a passenger jet is supposed to have been swallowed up and films are made of it, heroes are worshipped and wars made rampant yet the real story has not been told.

Which brings us to the pièce de résistance, the event that fixed in our psyche this evil attack on our freedoms and allowed the rest of the story to come together as a package of horrors perpetrated by others whom we must kill and give our freedom for. But as we have seen believability is not in abundance here.

It is settled in the minds of the majority that hijacked planes were used by Muslim fanatics to slam into the WTC towers. This largely due to what we were shown on the day itself and ad-infinitum by the mainstream media since. The mainstream media generally speaking does not investigate but regurgitates without question what 'insiders' and 'officials' feeds it. We have already discovered that Flight 11 didn’t fly on 9/11 but it was this flight we were told hit the first tower later causing it to disintegrate mostly into dust. The only film of this event was, we were told, captured live by two French brothers out filming for a documentary that day with a New York fire crew. The Naudet footage was released the following day, the 12th.

We are told it shows Flight 11 slipping inside the North Tower but you would be a fool to wager on that! See for yourself if you can positively identify a Boeing 767 in this short clip link. Forget what they tell you what do you see? This is all the physical evidence there is. In it there is apparently a plane passing overhead followed by a collision and an explosion, but you can you see our plane? As opposed to 'something'?



The visit of the next incoming missile is one of the most memorable events in recorded history and alone wiped out human rights across the planet and led to the massacre of millions, but was it staged too? I have studied this subject for some time now and have come to the conclusion that the whole thing was set up by people other than those blamed and that no passenger jets crashed on 9/11. You don't have to believe that but there are big holes in the official version of this. So far in this investigation we are missing three out of three but everyone saw this one crashing through the tower, right? Reaching this reasonable conclusion has led to me being called many derogatory names! "Everyone saw it", they insist. But that doesn't make it real. What we actually saw, once scrutinised, many think defies all logic and the laws of science, physics and gravity. Don’t take my word for it and certainly don’t take anyone else’s word for it, have a look for yourself. Here link

September Clues reveals the full extent of this deception. It is a detailed compilation of the evidence we were shown at the time. Digitally scrutinised and compared back to back it is clear to see that the perpetrators of this series of unusual events weren't so brilliant after all and left a great trail of evidence. Every news clip is linked to source and proven to be fake. A big statement? Look at the evidence.The dots don't join up. Here and on a small number of the TV stations at the time, just once, the ‘plane’ can be seen to travel clear through this great structure.


This scene was later edited out of circulation by these TV stations but can be seen in all its glory in this short clip. You are challenged to deny this is a missile passing through the South Tower with the nose exiting undamaged through the other side like it slid through jelly. link

Here you can see how much of the ‘amateur’ footage of this plane passing unscathed right through a steel-framed skyscraper was faked. Such a remarkable feat would have to be! A Boeing 767/757 nose is plastic and hollow. The idea that it could cope with a collision with dense grid of steel box columns, twice, is absurd.


Of all the shots of the incoming Flight 175 there isn't one that shows it to be a passenger jet. Not one. We see various shots of a 'plane' or black blob close to the tower and an explosion, many credited to 'professional photographers', but none reveal this detail.

Here is a black looking plane. Captured, we are told, by a professional photographer, Robert Clark on this bright sunny morning.


What's going on here? Does this look like the plane is about to hit nose first? Captured by an amateur photographer. (Moshe Bursuker)

Another pro, Anthony Costifas


And another one, (Robert Cumins)

Even Pulitzer prize winning photographer Kelly Guenther failed to capture that crucial shot showing windows or logos.


Forget what witnesses saw – missiles, big planes, little planes, no planes - this is what the world was shown on the news. What 'the news' tells us defines what we believe. Some news stations did screen footage of the passing through of this object early on 9/11 but limited our view by clumsily placing their banner over the crucial moment or momentarily blacking out the screen or switching camera angles. Or all three! FOX weren't alone in missing the moment totally. This is what they showed. The colour to the left is the South Tower explosion or 'plane crash', if you like.


More dreadfully unfortunate coincidences! The defining moment of our time and the live coverage is tainted. You can see this happen here link

Remember September 11 2001 was a bright sunny day. There were no clouds in the sky. You could see clearly for miles but that is not how it looks on the murky 'live' recordings of the main WTC event. They use various screen colours and the quality of coverage is appalling for top rate TV stations with incredibly well positioned cameras. Detailed research indicates that computer graphics were used to create these scenes and not very good ones at that. But good enough to fool the one time viewer. Ruthless terrorists are not necessarily stupid. CGI = Computer Generated Imagery link Here one researcher shows us just how easy this is:

The BBC showed...

Of the few so called 'live' shots showing the South Tower event and captured by hovering news helicopters, a couple show a plane entering the picture from the right side, crossing the screen half way, then disappearing behind the edge of the first burning tower. Contrary to what we were led to believe no live 9/11 videos showed any plane actually hitting anything. Link Think otherwise? Think again.





History Channel


WAB 11

The NBC 'live' helicopter footage returned no better than this

In these scenes (above and below) the plane is seen to dive in from a greater height than seen in most of the other footage where it comes in level. Again the moment of impact is obscured.


And this 'live' from the FOX Chopper 5

See a pattern? This is how the live coverage looked on the day. Looking back it doesn't real, it's almost cartoon like. In the cold light of day we really need to put our preconceptions to one side and look again at what happened on 9/11 and see who benefited.

A further three dozen amateur videos emerged in the coming months and years but they are no better at clarifying anything and all seem to contradict and cancel out each other. You really couldn't make this stuff up!





(The plane is behind the NY banner for the next few shots so to save space they have been left out)









(It's inside the building for the next few... obviously!)











In the film of the event, slowed down, you can clearly observe the wing tips of this remarkable weapon slicing through the steel, concrete and glass like it's cutting through butter. Science as we know it does not permit a soft alloy to cut through steel in any circumstances, it doesn't matter how fast the soft object is travelling nor who is projecting it. The outcome would be the same if a building were to fall on a plane. Duh! Even a small stone pebble launched at speed would win out against the biggest aluminium plane. Poor flies hit glass windscreens at 20 mph 200 mph & 400 mph but never slip inside leaving a silhouette of themselves in the glass, now do they? Except in cartoons.

According to Newton’s Third Law, when two objects meet there will be an equal and opposite reaction. The effects of a several hundred mile an hour collision will be felt equally by the plane as by the steel. I have little recall of the time I spent in my science class but one thing that has followed me through life is a clear grasp of Newton's conclusions here. Were I daft enough to try and do some damage to a slab of steel using my fist I would lose dramatically and the harder I tried the worse the reaction would be for me. I wouldn't have to hit it hard to smash my wrist to bits. There is no scientific research - or better still life experience - that will support the idea that the bones in my hand will smash clean through any steel object. I wouldn't even dent it. Nor try. Not that much of a loony! This isn't a theory it's just how it is and the laws of motion were not suspended on 9/11 no matter what the religious persuasion of the pilot or the speed they were travelling.

Even against a bird a plane can suffer catastrophic damage and the bird always will. Except on 9/11 when planes were said to have cut through lampposts, burrowed into the ground, sliced through thick blocks of steel and brick and through walls all with no resistance and no apparent damage to the softer object.



US AIRWAYS N106US AIRBUS A320, landed in Hudson River after a bird strike.. New Jersey, USA. Jan 2009. Copyright Tom Turner.


In this scene the building appears to repair after the plane slips through! Slow motion reveals what the naked eye is denied. Real planes would not have achieved this essential effect and would mostly crumble upon contact - on the outside - leaving no reason to bring the buldings down.


The tail is all that remains on view! No parts break off and there is not much of a hole until after the fire dies down when it is revealed as the shape of a plane!

The tail section soon disappears inside the jelly building. The flash was observed close to both points of impact on both towers. We may also observe that the plane does not explode until after it fully enters the building.

So what if this plane wasn’t the one US investigator thought. Whatever it was hit the tower made it fall down, right? Well even that looks questionable once you look again at what really happened. Soon after the floors 'fell to the ground' in what the US Govt called a pancake collapse there would surely be something in the region of 100 office floors stacked one on top one another down below, right? The towers were 110 stories high, with nearly an acre of floor space on each level, thousands of filing cabinets, computers, desks and chairs, but let's be generous and take away a few floors where the missile hit. The ‘hidden in the basement’ explanation for all this material disappearing has been put to rest by release of images from the seven basement levels of the WTC showing the area to be intact and uninvaded by skyscrapers from above.

If you still wonder if this is all just a series of coincidences, try realistically explaining the almost universal dustification of two steel and concrete towers. On 9/11 we were told the floor joists gave way due to the inferno caused by the fires. If we are to believe this is so, the core, which the floors were attached to, should still be in tact. This is what happened in this ‘collapse’ so they claim…

This is what actually happened…


Did the Al Qaeda Air Force really manage to turn this mass of steel and concrete mostly into dust with office fires? We all saw the aviation fuel mostly burn off upon impact in those awesome fireballs. Construction grade steel has a melting point of around 2750 °F whereas aviation fuel cannot burn hotter than 1,800 °F. It'd melt the engines if it got any hotter! In the engine the conditions are ideal, in the WTC offices the fires are exposed to the open air so can concentrate heat less. And all that black smoke means the fire isn't really firing. Little fires = little heat.

What of this close up of the gash cut into the outer steel frame. Far from a raging inferno if you look closely you can see a woman in white trousers near the lower centre of the image stood at the edge looking out. This is Edna Cintron. link Edna seems to be unaffected even at the entry hole by the fires said to be raging and weakening the steel all around her. We know from firefighter radio messages that they had reached the impact point on the 78th floor and that the fires, in two small pockets, were nothing special.

Big spectacular explosions we saw a million times and then lots of black smoke.

Once the dust had settled on what remained of the WTC it became even more apparent to those with inquisitive minds that something seriously amiss. Not least the wreckage. Note that the steel frame in this image is all that remained standing after the event .Above this lobby area void at ground level were 110 office floors stacked a quarter of a mile into the sky.

Until 9/11 when it all went away…


Below is a part of the sturdy steel core of 47 steel box columns running through the middle of the towers. These monsters weren't alone in bending peculiarly out of shape without cracking. There were many other unexplained anomalies involving heavy metal objects which have been investigated in detail by Dr Judy Wood.


One that didn't bend

Each tower was supported by a structural core extending from its bedrock foundation to its roof. 200,000 tons in total. The cores were rectangular pillars with numerous large columns and girders, measuring 87 feet by 133 feet. The core structures housed the elevators and all the lifting gear, the stairwells and other services. Whatever the fine detail it’s pretty clear there was some heavy shit in the middle of these towers holding this mass of material in place.

Here seen under construction the steel core builds a formidable obstruction to a rapid, unopposed collapse.



Were they really toppled by office fires?

The official report link told us that the floors failed due to fire damage at the point of impact causing a breakaway from the central core; each floor dropping down onto the next and so on, creating a stack, or pile, down below around the undamaged steel core. Or so it should be. But here is the core.

Here in the following sequence and captured on film. link We can observe it physically turn into dust, raising intriguing questions about the weaponry used to perform the destruction which pretty much entirely accounted for two gargantuan ¼ mile high skyscrapers, 200 elevators and all that go with them, 1000’s of filing cabinets and almost everything else. Most of the structures didn’t so much fall to the ground as blow away in the wind!

Click on picture for video (courtesy of thewebfairy.com)m

In this recorded sequence what remains of the core evaporates before our eyes

The smoking area in the centre of this shot is all that remains of WTC 1. The building to the left with the gaping hole in the middle was WTC 5. And to the left of it all that remains of WTC 7. WTC 2 was up right of centre.

These building did not fall down they were blown to smitherines.

Rather than a couple of buildings collapsing, as claimed by officials, this is better described as an explosion. This is a building pulverizing all of the concrete much of the steel and spewing heavy metal chunks hundreds of feet up and outwards.

One does not need to be a scientist to appreciate the obvious. The twin towers blew up. They systematically turned to dust from the top down and significantly it all happened in around 10-12 seconds, which is about the same time as in free-fall with no resistance.

See it close up. In this short clip. It's rapid! link


What force projected these heavy steel spandrels such great distances?


Catapulted them across the street

This is what remains of WTC 6. Notice the peculiar vertical round holes punched through the center of these multi story steel framed office buildings. What did this? The holes are largely empty so can falling debris be blamed?

23/9/01. Source: USGS/NOAA

The WTC tower is seen peeled back like a banana to the left of centre with WTC 6 to the right peppered with holes. The rubble pile is mostly made up of the shiny outer aluminium cladding of the towers and dust.


This image was taken two days after the event on the morning of the 13th. The lack of material where the tower once stood is clear to see. One explanation for this was that the main suspects ordered the crime scene to be cleared up and the remains shipped to China for recycling. This would be a crime in itself and very suspicious but from what we can see most of the material was blown up and blew away in the wind anyway. What we do see makes up a pitifully small percentage of the total.


And there are multiple testimonies and recordings of explosions going off in the towers from many witnesses including over 100 first responders (or emergency services as we call them in the UK). This is telling testimony to the truth of 9/11. link


At ground level inside the 8-story WTC 6


An infrared image of the aftermath


Every building that was destroyed had a prefix of WTC. There was surprisingly little collateral damage done to surrounding buildings. The WTC buildings that were not levelled had multiple circular holes punched from above - especially WTC5 and WTC6.


What about WTC 7? This was 47-story reinforced steel-framed skyscraper aka The Solomon Brothers Building. This thing wasn’t hit by any kind of missile but fell straight down in near freefall speed late in the afternoon of 9/11. You can see it fall here and decide for yourself if this is a simple fire induced collapse. link Such was the horror of all these buildings’ crumbling at such a rapid rate with apparently nothing to resist the ‘fall’ you would imagine there might be some kind of an inquiry into how come, but of course that was the last thing on sick minds. Sick minds were intent on inflicting further terror on the human race and doing what the mystery hijackers were supposed to be trying to do: take away our freedoms. The War of Terror is serving only the interests of those who orchestrated 9/11. Follow the money.

Inexplicably the BBC announced the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it actually happened late in the afternoon of 9/11. WTC 7 can be clearly seen in the background of the live shot as the news presenter announces to the world that it has fallen down. This footage recovered by researchers (aka 'theorists') from news archives only adds to the claims of prior knowledge somewhere closer to home than the bogeyman’s cave. You can also see this live link fizzle out due to a ‘technical hitch’ just before WTC 7 really does collapse at 5.20pm saving the reporter Jane Standley a great deal of embarrassment. The BBC first told us a huge building had fallen neatly into its own footprint when it hadn’t and then messed up showing this incredible event live to the world when it did! An uncanny set of circumstances. Then in February 2007 the BBC’s Richard Porter claimed in the wake of this material resurfacing and the BBC needing to explain it, that they “no longer have the original tapes of (their) 9/11 coverage.” They lost the tapes! link

We are expected to believe that the world's premiere news organisation somehow lost all its recordings of perhaps the biggest news event of the past 60 years. Richard Porter went on to explain the loss as a “cock-up,” rather than a conspiracy and called for any viewers with a recording of the BBC’s output on 9/11 to get in touch because he’d “love to get hold of it”. Well here it is: link The same questions remain the more this goes un-investigated it’s just that more people are asking them.

The majority of Americans are still to this day unaware WTC 7 even existed let alone the fact that someone blew it away on 9/11. Little media coverage was given particularly in the US to the mysterious demise of this only the third high rise office building in history to fall down due to fire. The New York Times touched on the problem on 29/11/01:

“Almost lost in the chaos of the collapse of the World Trade Center is a mystery that under normal circumstances would probably have captured the attention of the city and the world. That mystery is the collapse of a nearby 47-story...Building 7 didn't get much attention in the media."

Someone blew the shit out of a really big skyscraper and only so called conspiracy theorist want to talk about it! WTC wasn’t even mentioned by the 9/11 Commission! Implying perhaps that it never happened?

One minute it was there

The next it was gone…


NYPD officer Craig Bartmer is in no doubt about what happened to Building 7

“I walked around it (Building 7). I saw a hole. I didn’t see a hole bad enough to knock a building down, though. Yeah there was definitely fire in the building, but I didn’t hear any… I didn’t hear any creaking, or… I didn’t hear any indication that it was going to come down. And all of a sudden the radios exploded and everyone started screaming ‘get away, get away, get away from it!’… It was at that moment… I looked up, and it was nothing I would ever imagine seeing in my life. The thing started pealing in on itself… Somebody grabbed my shoulder and I started running, and the shit’s hitting the ground behind me, and the whole time you’re hearing “boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.” I think I know an explosion when I hear it… Yeah it had some damage to it, but nothing like what they’re saying… Nothing to account for what we saw… I am shocked at the story we’ve heard about it to be quite honest.” link

Conspiracy theorists and government agents claim the building was critically damaged by the collapse of WTC 1 and was further weakened by fire but the evidence is overwhelmingly against that notion. Serious damage was caused by flying steel panels to the Bankers Trust building which was in the direct line of fire of WTC 2 unlike WTC 7 which was obscured by WTC 6. The Bankers Trust didn't collapse.

This is representative of the ‘inferno’ that WTC 7 became with, in reality, some small isolated office fires on a few floors and more of that smoke.


Yet this is what it became in a few seconds


Neat Job Osama!

It is beyond reasonable doubt that bombs went off in WTC 7 all of which is still denied by the usual suspects. It is clear to see from this information alone that they are lying to us about what happened this day. link


Scientific researcher Dr Judy Wood calculates that “the upper 90 percent, approximately, of the inside of WTC 7 was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.”


I’m no scientist but I am no fool either. That looks like a pretty good estimation to me and even if it weren’t deadly accurate the destruction of this large structure by fire would make me very suspicious of the official version of events. No modern steel frame concrete building ever collaped due to fire either before or since 9/11.

Here is another reason. Spend a moment with the corroborating images and the film, which show another large plane flying above all the chaos where there should be none if we are to believe the official version. There are many witnesses to this aircraft, media professionals and White House staff who had been evacuated as the events unfolded. The 9/11 Commission acknowledged the presence of the mystery plane but chose to ignore that too!


You can see clear film of this four engine jet as it was seen by many to circle overhead just as the smoke began to rise over the Pentagon a short distance away across the river. link CNN's Senior White House correspondent John King clearly saw it while standing directly across from the White House. King reported live that "about 10 minutes ago, there was a white jet circling overhead. Now, you generally don't see planes in the area over the White House. That is restricted air space. No reason to believe that this jet was there for any nefarious purposes, but the Secret Service was very concerned, pointing up at the jet in the sky." This plane is identified as a US military E-4B, state of the art flying command post. Link

The E-4B's official designation is the National Emergency Airborne Command Post (NEACP), pronounced "knee-cap." But the aircraft is more commonly known as the "doomsday plane," because its premier function is to serve as a flying command, control and communications center in the event of a national emergency ­ or nuclear war. It was cruising around the most restricted airspace in the USA, over the White House, but the Govt aren't for explaining. No other planes were up since they were all forced to land once word was out that planes had been 'hijacked'. Those who know what happened on 9/11 deny any plane was in the air over the Pentagon other than the one they say crashed but here it is for us all to see and others saw it too. Best we believe what our instincts tell us rather than what other people tell us. Especially war criminals like those who went to slaughter communities across Iraq on the back of a lie about Weapons of Mass Destruction and are coincidentally doing the very same thing in Afghanistan because of this set of peculiar unexplained events they dubbed Nine Eleven.

The E-4B's

It’s an even less reported aspect of the 9/11 story that thousands of the first responders who weren’t sacrificed on the day itself – fire fighter, medics, police officers and rescue dogs have since fallen ill or died of respiratory diseases, cancer and kidney disease. The majority, 60%, of rescue workers have fallen ill in the aftermath of 9/11 and many have died as a result of the poisons they were exposed to and deceived about. link

Such is the lack of compassion of the main suspects who have sold the falsehoods around this event that the fire fighters who did survive the demolition and later fell ill and are no longer able to work have had their access to state benefits removed and have been in many cases left destitute while simultaneously being slowly poisoned further by cocktails of drugs. link This is no joke and it isn't funny.


These government employees were advised not to talk publicly about what they knew about bombs in buildings on 9/11 so not to have their careers affected. Such threats are telling enough in themselves, but there’s more. Only those who perpetrated this evil act could think it acceptable to deny the rescue workers the small reward of social security for their service, and so it is. The publicly portrayed heroes whose suffering on 9/11 was a big part of the call to move troops into the Middle East for the final stage of the takeover there are symbolic of the attitude the perpetrators of these events have towards all of us. Now, led by a one time unquestioning patriotic Republican, those who suffered the greatest loss on 9/11 have established Fire fighters For 911 Truth and they have some story to tell. link

Erik Lawyer told the Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth press conference in March 2010 that the fire fighters were rising up and calling for a new investigation as we all must. He accuses the National Institute of Science and Technology for lying about bombs in the WTC and revealing that his organisation has compiled the radio transmission reporting explosions, audio recordings of explosions, video recordings of explosions and the statements of at least 118 first responders who witnessed explosions. Many said it sounded like the “bang-bang-bang” you hear during a demolition. Nutters! All nutters who are 'into' conspiracy theories!

“I know from personal experience there’s about five times as many out there that believe what we believe but don’t have the courage to sign it” (their petition calling for a new investigation). Lawyer goes on to call the investigation into the collapse of three towers as “the most incompetent investigation of all time.”

Fire fighters for 9-11 Truth have aligned with A&E for 911 Truth and many others in seeking a new investigation and must be heard. link Exposing 9/11 for what it is is the duty of us all. 9/11 is an opportunity to change the direction of humanity and make this world the kind of place it should be.

There is a great deal more detail of information about the real 9/11 and what it represents all uncovered in great detail in countless books and films and websites. There’s ample evidence of foreknowledge, insider trading on airline stocks before 9/11, the military stand down, faked phone calls, the destruction and withholding of crime scene evidence such as airliner passenger lists, videos of passengers boarding the planes, the voice recording from United Flight 93, the coordinated war games, the intimidation and killing of witnesses and whistle blowers and the catalogue of similar false flag operations by governing gangsters throughout history.

It doesn't matter so much what exactly did happen on 9/11 just that we recognise we haven't been told anything like the truth. 9/11 was an attack upon us all. The War on Terror is The War of Terror. This one event has so far led to two wars, millions of lives lost, an alarming attack on civil liberties with more to come, particularly if they are allowed to get away with this. They, the key suspects, are the only winners in this game. It's up to each and every one of us to change that.

Keith Mann 1/7/10






Holmgren and Reynolds on No Planes on 911-
Exposing the Illusion
By Ronald Bleier

firefighters expose 9/11 read
wakey wakey by keith mann read
9/11 firefighters stand up to the extremists. this is red hot! read
distinguished leaders and experts read
us intelligence general says 9/11 was a fraud read
top officials question 9/11 read
9/11 flight data, two of 4 planes didn’t even take off read
an appeal to firefighters, present and past read
debunking conspiracy theorists 13/3/10 read
the 9/11 hijackers are alive 9/3/10 read
reinvestigate 9/11 17/2/10 read
dr judy wood read
core of corruption read
charlie sheen says 9/11 was inside job 11/9/09 read
corrs guitarist: 9/11 was an inside job 14/6/08 read

Click to watch:

Click to watch:


From Dusk 'til Dawn
An Insider's View of the Growth of the Animal Liberation Movement

© Keith Mann