is a war being waged on humanity and the animal kingdom and the process
of testing toxic chemicals on animals in order to prove them safe before
they are given to people is a major front.
This is what we know.
Animal tests have passed as safe for human consumption: all pesticides,
pharmaceuticals and preservatives. Basically everything poisonous to humans!
Botulinum toxin, mercury and aspartame all passed the animal tests and
made it to market. Thalidomide and Vioxx alone destroyed tens of thousands
of lives and there are many products of a similar nature doing likewise
after being passed as safe following the untimely and unpleasant death
of who-knows-how-many sentient beings trapped in cages in secret facilities
all across the world. It is the rule rather than the exception to pass
as safe for human use products that are dangerous. Using animals enables
poison pushers to licence anything for public consumption, which is after
all the point.
We also know the media
have blamed animal rights activists for this or that over the years, they’re
even accused of holding back medical progress for protesting vivisection,
but how much of what we hear is the truth or even close to it? What about
the animals at the centre of all this, are they leading a revolution in
health care or are they themselves holding it back?
It was May 1st of
2007 when hundreds of police officers were despatched to crush Stop Huntingdon
Animal Cruelty (SHAC) the eight year old campaign against the gruesome
animal testing labs of Huntingdon Life Sciences. Thirty addresses were
invaded on this symbolic date and 19 UK citizens arrested. In February
of 2009 following protracted legal proceedings seven were sentenced to
a total of nearly 50 years in prison for their very public campaign to
close down HLS, or ‘blackmail’ as the authorities have dubbed
it for the purpose of crushing it. Look at the evidence, none of these
people were accused of any illegal activity in this campaign, although
it is universally agreed that all have similar objectives to others who
have occasionally broken the law in seeking a conclusion to the HLS problem.
That’s about it. What the campaign did was state its intention to
stick with HLS until it capitulated and quit using violence to make its
profits. That's the point of campaign of public pressure to bring a change
In HLS labs 500 animals
are poisoned to death daily and many of these sentient individuals are
experimented with repeatedly. They've been at it for over 50 years at
HLS. And the wonder drugs they've generated? We're still waiting. Hoping!
And not just for this hideous place to produce a miracle cure but for
the whole sick industry to make good of the vast resources and countless
lives it consumes. Vivisection is moulded on death and destruction while
displaying a caring, life saving image based on government regulations
and the hope of miracles just around the corner, but vivisection is exposed
as a scientific fraud.
The SHAC activists
were imprisoned for being party to a global initiative to close HLS. HLS
and its workers break the law and so do the police, much more often and
oft times fatally yet there has been no similar campaign of harassment
targeting these organisations with a view to dismantling them. Of course
the pharmaceutical industry is pulling the strings and is loaded with
negative forces. Campaigning for the rights of all animals is a world
away from this mentality. This campaign against HLS and vivisection more
generally has therefore attracted a great deal of political intervention
in recent years culminating most recently in this series of trials and
the building of more and more vivisection laboratories aka ‘animal
houses’, ‘hotels for animals’ and equally as perverse
‘life science’ facilities, where only an idiot, a fool or
a perpetrator would deny that animals are tortured. A further trial of
activists involved in the campaign against HLS is set for 2010. http://www.shac.net
Something that hasn’t
been reported by the media as they scream hysteria over the alleged harassment
and what they lazily term 'terrorism' is the second aspect of the control
measures imposed on these compassion driven citizens. Four have been served
Anti Social Behaviour Orders (ASBO’s) preventing them from –
ever again – knowingly participating in, organising or controlling
any; demonstration, gathering or website protesting against animal experimentation.
The others have to avoid protesting in this extremist manner against vivisection
for five years upon release or they'll be sent back to prison! This desecration
of civil liberties comes from a Labour government that promised a review
of animal experimentation and instead set about mopping up the most annoying
This coupled with
the annual ritual sacrifice of millions of animals to the medical alter
and the effects of the products they pass as safe in animals for humans
leaves nothing healthy for us as a legacy. A violent response to a challenge
to the status quo is to be expected and seeks to quell the strength of
public will to end the gross futility of vivisection and take humanity
and health care forward. Yet the campaign against HLS is alive and imaginative
carried by the strength of compassion and the company flounders in a deep
pit of its own making. HLS is today around $80 million in debt and no
longer owns any of its property since being forced to sell it to pay debts
incurred since the inner workings of the ‘life science’ death
labs were laid bare to public scrutiny. See http://vivisection-absurd.org.uk/
to find out the real truth about the essential medical research that dangles
humanity on a dream and swallows vast resources and all hope of miraculous
cures for the many things that make us ill, many of them ironically animal
tested in the first place! It is true this scam is but one in a long list,
but boy is it a cruel one! One that animal rights campaigners have been
used by the media and politicians to divert all our attention from.
were a government New Labour pledged a Royal Commission into vivisection.
On gaining the public vote they needed, they not only reneged on that
promise but have arrogantly ignored all appeals for any kind of independent
inquiry into this vast unscientific theory while some 50 million animals
have died in British laboratories in and around our communities. Tens
of thousands of vulnerable human patients have died too, poisoned by animal
tested drugs that can never be proven safe in animals. And when the time
comes and your life is taken over my a mystery syndrome and you try and
sue to get some measly compensation, the victims and their families are
cynically hindered by Defendant claims that their product was tested on
animals according to the law and so its not their fault that things have
gone so terribly wrong and caused'adverse' effects in humans. Because
all animals are different. Duh! This whole process is so sick and twisted
it’s way beyond the comprehension of most people but this is the
reality that is hidden behind the so called 'extremists' we all know who
are used to defect some of the attention.
same dark forces have given the nod to the Bank of England to supply
HLS with banking facilities after all the High St. banks declined, a
move that would save this failed business from going under. At your
expense? The UK tax payer also funds HLS insurance. HLS staff have been
caught out by an endless stream of infiltrators working for the greater
good falsifying test data, repeatedly breaking their own quite meaningless
Code of Conduct and abusing animals wholesale. Animal research and testing
is collectively known as vivisection and is a liability to human and
animal health on a vast scale. Of course our governments love it!
Since the Labour muppets took over the show the shock troops have been
let loose to attack opponents of vivisection and today there are over
a dozen UK citizens serving between four and 12 years in prison. The
allegations levelled against the majority are conspiratorial and the
fine detail of actual criminal behaviour is hard to find in the mountains
of depositions. None was accused of causing death or injury to anyone
and just two accused of damaging any property yet the monster they oppose
sacrifices millions in its rituals.
Over a decade after they cynically broke their pledge to look into the
fine detail of animal experiments and instead increased the number of
animals used we again have a tease on the table from the Labour politicians.
We were invited to ask our elected representatives (the majority being
Labour of course) to sign an Early Day Motion which calls for a statistical
assessment of the benefits of animal studies compared with the human
experience. This would be the first ever conducted. The Safety of Medicines
(Evaluation) Bill 2009 is intended to tackle the escalating problem
of adverse drug reactions, which hospitalise one million Britons and
cost the NHS £2 billion every year. However, this is not an independent
inquiry. This is a crucial point. Should the Bill succeed:
(Medicines Safety Evaluation Panel)
(1) The Secretary of State must, within six months of the date on which
this Act is passed, appoint a Medicines Safety Evaluation Panel (“the
(2) The members of the Panel are to be appointed by the Secretary of
State and must include:
(a) no fewer than two statisticians from the Office for National Statistics,
(b) no fewer than eight members of the National Institute for Health
(3) The Secretary of State may nominate one of the members of the Panel
to act as chairman.
(4) The Secretary of State must, in appointing members to the Panel,
take steps to ensure that no members appointed have any commercial or
other interests which may conflict with their duties on the Panel.
How excited are you!
That politicians cannot be trusted is a given. In the last century hundreds
of millions of people were killed by politicians in government. How
many of us voted for that? Pro vivisection campaigners are working to
get MP's to oppose this Bill and any like it. What does that indicate?
Bear in mind Oxford University spawned a majority of these bright sparks
and hosts a network of secretive animal research laboratories where
bad things happen.
Any threat of an investigation into animal experimentation causes very
real fear in those who engage in this savagery and their sponsors. Forget
placards and megaphones this is the stuff of nightmares for those who
experiment with other beings. The wicked are at ease in the presence
of fear and suffering yet are terrified by the outside world watching
them inflict it. It is important we forge a forward thinking consensus
on this whole bizarre process, lest we sanction it through our ignorance
in the hope they will find us cures. Any inspection of this highly secretive,
dreadfully wasteful and entirely violent world must be wholeheartedly
encouraged by us all, but with a watchful eye. Any failure to openly
and honestly report the findings will be a sign of deceit and a personal
insult, and will expose again the political contempt for those outside
the sinister circle. Let’s not underestimate the devastating effect
a proper assessment of the facts surrounding animal experiments will
have on the almighty, the ruthless, pharmaceutical industry. Just loud
enough demands for one will bring the worst out of these people for
all to see. The benefit to human medicine will be equally profound.
They will do all in their power to stop this happening but we have all
EDM 569 ended mid Novemeber and was supported by 243 MPs, ranking it
joint 10th out of 2,421 EDMs in this parliamentary session. In other
words, it was better supported that 99.5% of other EDMs. Interestingly,
one of the few EDMs attracting more support was the sixth-placed EDM545
which called for more resources and political will to be directed towards
reversing the increases in numbers of animals used in experiments.
EDM 569 offered a slim chance to make history by statistically evaluating
animal tests with medicine safety for the first time. Pro vivisection
groups are firmly opposed to this ground breaking approach to finding
the best path to health care and the reasons for that are clear.
The best guess for the correlation of adverse reactions in man and animal
toxicity data is somewhere between 5% and 25%. (Animal Toxicity Studies:
Their Relevance to Man, Lumley and Walker (eds) (Quay, 1989), 57-67)
There is a war
being waged on humanity and the animal kingdom and the process of testing
toxic chemicals on animals in order to prove them safe before they are
given to people is a major front. If you care then you know what to
do. Something! No pressure cos the world is full of people like you
and the world is waking up but the time to act and connect with others
in our society who are defending the lines is now. By all means contact
your MP and give them a heads up on this issue but if you really want
something doing don’t rely on them to do it.
** A further assault on the citizens of this country who speak out against
the pharma mafia was carried out on November 10 by dozens of balaclava
wearing thugs who smashed their way into homes looking for anti vivisection