Gates says vaccines can help reduce world population
recent TED conference presentation, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates, who
has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new vaccine efforts, speaks
on the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate change. He presents
a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows: CO2 = P x S x E x C.
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit
he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero, "probably one of these numbers
is going to have to get pretty close to zero."
that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number -- P (for People)
-- might be reduced. He says:
world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion.
Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive
health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."
can watch this yourself at:
the world population through vaccines
statement by Bill Gates was not made with any hesitation, stuttering or
other indication that it might have been a mistake. It appears to have been
a deliberate, calculated part of a well developed and coherent presentation.
does it mean when Bill Gates says "if we do a really great job on new
vaccines... we could lower [world population] by 10 or 15 percent?"
this statement implies that vaccines are a method of population reduction.
So is "health care," which all NaturalNews readers already know
to be more of a "sick care" system that actually harms more people
than it helps.
that's the whole point of it. Given that vaccines technology help almost
no one from a scientific point of view http://www.naturalnews.com/029641_vaccine...,
it raises the question: For what purpose are vaccines being so heavily pushed
in the first place?
Gates seems to be saying that one of the primary purposes is to reduce the
global population as a mechanism by which we can reduce CO2 emissions. Once
again, watch the video yourself to hear him say it in his own words:
can vaccines actually be used to reduce world population?
conduct a mental experiment on this issue. If vaccines are to be used to
reduce world population, they obviously need to be accepted by the majority
of the people. Otherwise the population reduction effort wouldn't be very
in order for them to be accepted by the majority of the people, they obviously
can't just kill people outright. If everybody started dropping dead within
24 hours of receiving the flu shot, the danger of vaccines would become
obvious rather quickly and the vaccines would be recalled.
if vaccines are to be used as an effective population reduction effort,
there are really only three ways in which they might theoretically be "effective"
from the point of view of those who wish to reduce world population:
They might kill people slowly in a way that's unnoticeable, taking effect
over perhaps 10 - 30 years by accelerating degenerative diseases.
They might reduce fertility and therefore dramatically lower birth rates
around the world, thereby reducing the world population over successive
generations. This "soft kill" method might seem more acceptable
to scientists who want to see the world population fall but don't quite
have the stomach to outright kill people with conventional medicine. There
is already evidence that vaccines may promote miscarriages (http://www.naturalnews.com/027512_v...).
They might increase the death rate from a future pandemic. Theoretically,
widespread vaccination efforts could be followed by a deliberate release
of a highly virulent flu strain with a high fatality rate. This "bioweapon"
approach could kill millions of people whose immune systems have been weakened
by previous vaccine injections.
is a known side effect of some vaccines, by the way. A study documenting
this was published in PLoS. Read the story here: http://www.naturalnews.com/028538_seasonal_flu_shot_vaccines.html
the study title and citation: Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Increase
the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic Virus?
Viboud C, Simonsen L (2010) Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Increase
the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic Virus? PLoS Med 7(4):
short answer is yes, seasonal flu vaccines do cause increased susceptibility
to the H1N1 pandemic virus. In other words, seasonal flu vaccines could
set up the population for a "hard kill" pandemic that could wipe
out a significant portion of the global population (perhaps 10 to 15 percent,
as Bill Gates suggested).
their deaths could be blamed on the pandemic, thereby diverting blame from
those who were really responsible for the plot. As yet another beneficial
side effect for the global population killers, the widespread deaths could
be used as a fear tool to urge more people to get vaccinated yet again,
and the entire cycle could be repeated until world population was brought
down to whatever manageable level was desired... all in the name of health
more people around the world are vaccinated before the release of the "hard
kill" pandemic virus, the more powerful the effect of this approach.
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Perhaps not coincidentally, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has funneled
hundreds of millions of dollars into vaccine programs targeting people all
over the world. One such program is researching the development of "sweat-triggered
vaccines" that could use specially-coated nano-materials to deliver
vaccines to people without using injections.
interestingly, his foundation has also invested millions in sterilization
technologies that have been called a "temporary castration" solution.
that the actions of the Gates foundation are entirely consistent with the
formula for CO2 reduction that Bill Gates eluded to in his TED conference
speech: CO2 = P x S x E x C.
birth rates (through sterilization technologies) and increasing vaccine
penetration throughout the world population (by using sweat-triggered nano-vaccines),
his stated goal of reducing the world population by 10 to 15 percent could
be reached within just a few years.
will be left alive? The smart people
The interesting thing about all this is that this campaign to reduce global
population through vaccines will obviously not impact people who consciously
avoid vaccines. And those people, by and large, tend to be the more intelligent,
capable people who actually have an improved ability to move human civilization
forward with thoughtful consideration.
only imagine that those people designing this vaccine-induced population
control measure might be sitting around a table chuckling to themselves
and saying, "It's only the stupid people that are going to be killed
off anyway, so this is actually helping the future of humankind!" (Their
words, not mine.)
weird world government kind of way, this effort might actually be based
on some distorted vision of philanthropy where some of the most powerful
people in the world quite literally believe the way to save humanity is
to kill off as many of the gullible people as possible. Vaccines are, in
effect, an "evil genius" kind of way to conduct an IQ test on
the population at large: If you go get vaccinated every flu season, you're
not too bright and probably don't engage the kind of strong mental faculties
that humanity will no doubt need if it is to face a future where it is now
all but obvious we are not alone in the universe.
is to save itself from its own destruction and compete as an uplifted species
in our universe, killing off the least intelligent members of society (or
making them infertile) may appear to the world controllers to be a perfectly
reasonable approach. I disagree with that approach, but it may be precisely
what they are thinking.
case, choosing to receive a seasonal flu shot is undoubtedly an admission
that you have failed some sort of universal IQ test, whether or not this
is the intention of world influencers such as Bill Gates. More importantly,
it is also a betrayal of your own biology, because it indicates you don't
believe in the ability of your own immune system to protect you even from
the world vaccine conspirators figure that if people are willing to betray
themselves anyway, it's not much different for governments and institutions
to betray them as well. In other words, if you don't even care enough about
your own health to take care of your health, why should any government care
about protecting your health, either?
ponder this, also consider something else: The U.S. is going broke due to
sick-care costs which are rising dramatically under the new federal health
care reform guidelines. Can you guess the fastest and easiest way to reduce
those health care costs? If you guessed, "unleash a hard-kill pandemic
that takes out a significant portion of the weak or sick people" then
you guessed right. Sadly, killing off those most vulnerable to sickness
could save the U.S. government literally billions of dollars in sick-care
expenditures. Plus, it would save Social Security yet more billions by avoiding
ongoing monthly payouts. (Again, I am completely against such an approach
because I value human life, but I also know we live in a world where the
people in charge have little or no respect for human life and will readily
sacrifice human lives to achieve their aims.)
as Bill Gates goes, consider his statement in the context of what we've
discussed here: "The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed
up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines,
health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps
10 or 15 percent."
seems to make a lot of sense when you understand that reducing the population
reduces CO2 emissions, and using more vaccines on more people increases
the death rate of the population.
Try to avoid being among those 10 to 15 percent who get culled through global
vaccine programs. You will not only save your life, you'll also pass the
"universal IQ test" which determines whether you're smart enough
to know that injecting your body with chemicals and viral fragments in order
to stop "seasonal flu" is a foolish endeavor.
and wise, and you'll survive the world depopulation effort that victimizes
conventional thinkers who don't have the intelligence to question what they're
being told to do by their own corrupt governments.